Kentucky AG Defends Role In Breonna Taylor Grand Jury Process

Enlarge this image

Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron, pictured on Sept. 23, did not pursue charges related to the killing of Breonna Taylor. Her family lawyers say that indicates bias.

Timothy D. Easley/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

Timothy D. Easley/AP

Live Updates: Protests For Racial Justice
Kentucky Grand Jury Indicts 1 Of 3 Officers In Breonna Taylor Case

The letter, posted on Ben Crump’s website over the weekend, urges Cameron to recuse himself from future legal proceedings related to the killing of Taylor by Louisville Metro Police officers.

Crump notes that Cameron was asked by the Commonwealth Attorney’s office to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate whether charges should be brought against the three officers involved in the fatal shooting. Instead, the attorney general decided to prosecute the case himself.

«It is now clearer than ever that this was a case where you decided early on that your office would never actually prosecute against officers [Myles] Cosgrove, [Jonathan] Mattingly and anyone else responsible for the unlawful death of Breonna Taylor, the letter stated.

«Because your office is unwilling to fulfill your duties, we demand you that you recuse yourself from this matter and have the Kentucky Prosecutors Advisory Council appoint a special prosecutor who is willing to allow a grand jury to actually do its job, deliberate over all possible charges and render a decision on a True Bill for each, it continued.

Although the attorney general initially did not answer questions about which charges he had presented to the grand jury, upon imminent release of the court recordings, Cameron said that he did not recommend any charges against the officers for killing the 26-year-old Black woman.

Live Updates: Protests For Racial Justice
Officer Indicted In Breonna Taylor Case Pleads Not Guilty

The grand jury indicted former LMPD detective Brett Hankison last month on three charges of wanton endangerment for wildly firing into neighboring apartments in the course of the raid.

Cosgrove and Mattingly, who both repeatedly shot into Taylor’s apartment and remain on the force, were not indicted.

The grand jury’s decision touched off angry protests last month, and, as NPR’s Martin Kaste reports, «It’s revived long-standing doubts about the role of grand juries, especially in cases that involve police.

«A prosecutor leads the grand jury to whatever he needs them to be led to, Heather Crabbe, an attorney who served as a public defender for six years in Northern Kentucky, told NPR member station WFPL.

«[A prosecutors tells] the jury, you know, the charges before them, and they will present the evidence in a way that will lead to the result that they want, she added.

Given that Cameron never attempted to bring any charges related to Taylor’s death at the hands of police, Crabbe believes a second grand jury is unlikely.

«For the AG to do that, I think he would have to walk back a lot of what he’s already done, Crabbe said. «And he’d have to do a lot of legal gymnastics to explain why [Hankison] was charged with wanton endangerment, for shots that he missed, that went into someone else’s apartment, and why the other officers were not charged in Breonna Taylor’s death.