The House Will Vote On A Bill Meant To Counter Texas-Style Abortion Bans

Enlarge this image

The U.S. House of Representatives is set to vote on a bill to protect abortion rights on Sept. 24, 2021.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

hide caption

toggle caption

J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Law
The Supreme Court Heads Toward Reversing Abortion Rights

The Women’s Health Protection Act, H.R. 3755, would protect a person’s ability to decide to continue or end a pregnancy, and would enshrine health care providers’ ability to offer abortion services «prior to fetal viability without restrictions imposed by individual states, like requiring special admitting privileges for providers, or imposing waiting periods.

It also prohibits restrictions on abortion after fetal viability «when, in the good-faith medical judgment of the treating health care provider, continuation of the pregnancy would pose a risk to the pregnant patient’s life or health.

In the end, this vote may largely be symbolic. The bill is unlikely to advance in the Senate, where 10 Republicans and all Democrats would need to back the bill in order to meet the 60-vote threshold.

The Senate version of the bill, sponsored by Connecticut Democrat Richard Blumenthal, has 47 cosponsors. Notably, that does not include Pennsylvania Democrat Bob Casey, who has previously voted for abortion restrictions, and West Virginia moderate Joe Manchin.

Rep. Judy Chu, D-Calif., first introduced the Women’s Health Protection Act in 2013, when Republicans were in control of the House.

National
More Abortion Restrictions Have Been Enacted In The U.S. This Year Than In Any Other

«Now is the chance, she told MSNBC earlier this month, noting that Democrats have the votes in the House and President Biden’s support.

«We have had Roe v. Wade in effect for 50 years. We have been protected by that, she described. «It wasn’t until 2011, [when] we saw states pass these medically unnecessary laws — which dictated the width of clinic doors and forced doctors to have medically unnecessary admitting privileges or where they required an ultrasound — that we saw that we just have to get the Women’s Health Protection Act in place, so that…we weren’t playing whack-a-mole with each of these states and their laws.

The courts may still play a role. The Department of Justice is suing Texas, saying the state enacted the S.B. 8 «in open defiance of the Constitution.