The Controversial Election Review In Arizona Confirms Biden’s Win

Enlarge this image


Maricopa County, Ariz., ballots cast in the 2020 general election are examined in May.





Matt York/AP



hide caption



toggle caption


Matt York/AP



Politics
Republican-Led Election Reviews Take Shape In Pennsylvania And Wisconsin



Politics
The GOP-Led Arizona Election Review Appears Close To Finishing. Here’s What To Expect

Republicans in other states have visited the election review in Maricopa County, and initiated similar investigations in their states, despite a lack of evidence of widespread fraud or other issues with last year’s election.

But the Maricopa report itself throws cold water on the grandest claims of fraud.

«What has been found is both encouraging and alarming, the draft states. «On the positive side there were no substantial differences between the hand count of the ballots provided and the official canvass results for the county.

Pullen confirmed that the hand recount was «relatively close to the official tally.

«Was there massive fraud or anything? It doesn’t look like it, he added.

However, the draft report raises concerns about the county’s elections systems and record-keeping, and accuses Maricopa County officials of stonewalling their effort to perform «a complete audit.

«Had Maricopa County chosen to cooperate with the audit, the majority of these obstacles would have easily been overcome, the report states.

Pullen said other reports that will be presented in detail Friday have not yet been leaked, and that «anomalies found in voting records are vast enough to cast doubt on the final vote count — despite the hand recount’s confirmation of the result.

Maricopa County supervisors have refused to aid the contractors hired by Fann, accusing them of bias and inexperience after errant claims were made about the county’s election.

«The contractors hired by the Senate president are not auditors, and they are not certified by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, Maricopa County Board Chair Jack Sellers, a Republican, said in May. «It’s clearer by the day: the people hired by the Senate are in way over their heads. This is not funny; this is dangerous.

County officials responded on Twitter to the release of the draft copy of the report, writing that while it affirmed the results, «the report is also littered with errors & faulty conclusions about how Maricopa County conducted the 2020 General Election.

The county’s criticism of the reviewers is a sentiment shared by election experts across the country, who’ve warned that any findings by lead contractor Cyber Ninjas — a Florida-based cybersecurity firm that had no prior experience in elections and is led by a CEO who’s embraced conspiracies of election fraud — can’t be trusted. The same goes for subcontractors conducting other aspects of the Senate’s review, they say.

«This partisan effort in Arizona appears to be ending the same as it begun — highly biased, incompetent individuals running the process, delay after delay after delay, and very importantly, completely un-transparent, David Becker, founder of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, said earlier Thursday.

In the months since the review first began in late August, contractors and Arizona state Senate Republicans have drawn the scrutiny of the U.S. Justice Department, made errant claims about illegitimate votes that were promptly debunked, and disclosed that prominent Trump supporters engaged in efforts to delegitimize the former president’s defeat provided millions of dollars to fund the process.